The idea sparking the latest technology rush is as old as
the
sun: solar cell energy.
After years of shying away from funding solar cell energy
start-ups because of high costs, venture capitalists are
almost
tripping over themselves to sign up the most promising
companies,
many of them in Silicon Valley.
Breakthroughs in solar technology, favorable policy
proposals by
Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. John Kerry, disgust
about
dependence on foreign sources of oil, and skyrocketing
demand for
energy worldwide are all playing a role.
``There's clearly something going on here,'' says Erik
Straser, a
partner at Mohr Davidow Ventures who is prowling for
possible
investments, after he was asked by his firm to get up to
speed in
the sector.
Straser recently considered investing in San Jose's
Miasolé, a
hot solar cell start-up, but hesitated after extensive
research. But
another venture capital firm, Vantage Point, had been eyeing
the
deal and moved in to snag it. Vantage Point now has a team
of
partners focused on solar and other clean technologies.
This year, State Treasurer Phil Angelides has announced a
$1.5
billion plan to use the state's pension funds to invest in
environmental technologies, and $200 million has been
earmarked for
start-ups. And there's new buzz from Sacramento about a
legislative
proposal by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, which would pay $1
billion
in rebates for solar cell technology to be used on a million
California rooftops beginning next year.
Solar investment still makes up a tiny part of overall VC
investing, but money going into clean technologies is
growing. While
data on venture investments to solar start-ups is sketchy,
money
committed to clean technology companies is increasing. It
reached
about 2.4 percent of the total venture capital invested last
year,
compared with 0.8 percent in 1999, according to Ron Pernick
of Clean
Edge, a research group. About $300 million was invested in
clean
technologies during the first quarter of this year, with $59
million
going to energy-related deals, according to Cleantech
Ventures.
New fundings
The deals in solar cell technology, anecdotally at least,
are on
the rise. Over the past few months alone, a slew of
companies
boasting new solar technologies are announcing new fundings.
It's all attracting a new generation of entrepreneurs.
One is
39-year-old Sunil Paul, founder of anti-spam company
BrightMail,
which he sold recently for $390 million. He has since
invested in
two solar cell companies and can't get enough. He wants to
build
companies, he says, that go ``beyond just making money.''
He has started a Bay Area energy forum for entrepreneurs
and
others called the ``Power Lunch,'' with the aim of exploring
solar
and other alternative energy ideas.
Driving much of the excitement is a risky quest by
several newer
companies to bring about drastic cost reductions. All solar
companies rely on the same photovoltaic process: Sunlight in
the
form of photons hits a light-absorbing semiconductor
material in the
solar cell, exciting electrons and thus allowing them to
flow out of
the cell in the form of an electrical current.
Alternatives to silicon
Traditionally, solar cell manufacturers relied on costly
silicon
as the semiconductor. But the physical limits of silicon --
its
crystal form is bulky and inflexible -- have kept solar
cells three
times more expensive than traditional sources of energy for
the
power grid.
To overcome the cost, subsidies and government
regulations have
helped support growth in the solar cell industry output of
about 35
percent a year. Economies of scale are reducing costs up to 7
percent a year, but the progress is too slow to make solar
truly
competitive without subsidies.
So scientists are exploring some more revolutionary
techniques,
and they're making progress.
The new companies are doing away with silicon. One is
Miasolé,
which uses thin films of a copper alloy (called CIGS)
deposited on a
flexible metal. The process has already been used
successfully to
produce cheap, high-quality hard disks for disk drives.
Chief Executive David Pearce -- who looks the part of
environmental executive with green shirt, hazel green eyes
and a
green and yellow business card -- used the technology at a
previous
optical-components company he founded. Now, he says, he's
``supremely confident'' he can apply it to solar and expects
a
product to be on the market by the first quarter of next
year.
Then there are more radical efforts, including those of
Nanosolar, Konarka and Nanosys, using nanotechnology
materials to
create flexible solar cell sheets that can be mass produced
and
promise to rival the cost of traditional energy sources. The
first
products should be on the market in about two years.
Their semiconductor cells are one-thousandth the width of
silicon, made instead of particles of titanium oxide or
CIGS. These
are then printed on a metal roll in the form of a thin
flexible
film.
Arno Penzias, a Nobel Prize winner for physics, who is
now a
partner with New Enterprise Associates, and has invested in
Konarka,
realizes the bet is risky.
``More people have lost money in bets against silicon
than I
know,'' he says.
But then you're talking a huge possible payback: The
power market
is about $1 trillion.
The companies that are busy recalibrating the multiple
sensitive
chemical processes are sure to argue that their way is best.
Expert
Pernick says it's too early to say: ``We don't know yet
which one is
going to win out at the end of the day,'' he says.
Nanosolar, for instance, has developed a semiconductor
paint,
which saves it from the disadvantages of the usual wet
electrolyte
that could start leaking on a rooftop after a few years.
Konarka, in
response, says it has made good headway on creating a
sealant for
its electrolyte.
Both plan to print out their cells on large swathes of
foil.
Martin Roscheisen, chief executive of Nanosolar, hopes to
drive the
raw uninstalled cost of solar electricity down to about 40
to 60
cents per watt by 2006, from the $2.75 per watt cost reached
by
traditional solar manufacturers. This would bring the price
of solar
below most other grid sources, such as natural gas.
``The demand would be infinite,'' says Nanosolar investor
Marty
Lagod. ``We think its achievable. That's why we're excited
about the
area.''
Also driving the lower cost would be Nanosolar's ability
to print
cell foil in large quantities. It could cover whole parking
lots, or
be painted on the side of buses and cars. And by 2006,
Nanosolar
could have the capacity to produce enough energy to make up
20
percent of the global solar cell market, according to
Roscheisen.
Worldwide, solar is a $7 billion a year business,
according to
industry experts. The world's largest player, Japan's Sharp,
controls about a third of total solar cell output.
Other big players are making moves. General Electric
recently
bought Astropower, a solar power leader, and last month said
it
hopes to boost solar energy sales to $1 billion by the end
of the
decade.
Nanosolar's Roscheisen embodies the new interest among
Silicon
Valley veterans in solar. Roscheisen, 35, was an early
dot-com
pioneer, having sold Internet company eGroups to Yahoo for
$432
million in 2000 during what he says was ``my other life.''
Kicking around for his next business idea, he found most
software
and Internet technologies were well covered by other
companies. But
he noticed how much he was paying for inefficient heating
bills and
at the gas pump to fill up the guzzling Mercedes-Benz G500
he bought
from Sequoia venture capitalist Michael Moritz. Traveling
the world,
and inquiring about how to develop better energy sources, he
fell
upon the idea for Nanosolar.
For Roscheisen, the change of industries is a family
tradition.
His great great grandfather founded Germany's first regional
electricity utility, still powering Bavaria today -- but
only after
he first built a construction company.
Roscheisen says it was almost impossible to raise money
from VCs
back in 2002 when he first came up with the solar idea.
``Most
considered solar uninvestable,'' he says. Now he's gotten
backing
from big-name VC firms, and Monday plans to announce a $10
million
grant from the Department of Defense's research arm, DARPA.
To the contrary, he says, the industry plays to Silicon
Valley's
strength -- taking a technology developed first outside --
in this
case, Japan and Germany -- but adapting it in a more
cost-effective
way: ``This is what Silicon Valley is great at.''
SOLAR START-UPS
Here are some of the start-ups in the solar cell
industry that
have received venture capital funding recently.
Company name |
Location |
Amount |
Investors |
Konarka |
Lowell, Mass. |
$32.6 million |
New Enterprise Associates, Draper Fisher Jurvetson,
Partech, Vanguard Ventures, SDL Ventures, Prime New
Energy,
Good Energies, Presidio Venture Partners |
Miasole |
San Jose |
$6.9 million |
Garage Technology Ventures, Vantage Point, Firelake
Capital |
Nanosolar |
Palo Alto |
$5 million, $10 million research grant* |
US Venture Partners, Benchmark, Firelake Capital;
*DARPA,
the Department of Defense's research arm, provided the
grant |
Nanosys |
Palo Alto |
$55 million, ** $15 million in grants and research
deals |
Lux Capital, Polaris Venture Partners, Venrock
Associates;
**grants and deals with DuPont, Intel, Matsushita
Electric,
and In-Q-Tel |
Solaicx |
Los Gatos |
$2 million, round will be closed within next month,
according to company co-founder, John Sedgwick |
undisclosed |
Source: Companies, funding announcements